Does ‘What Works’ Work? The Quest for the Holy Grail in Physical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69665/iss.v46i2.62Keywords:
Quality Education, Health & Well-being, Schools, Physical Activity, Sport, Evidence-based practiceAbstract
The ‘What Works’ agenda within education has become popular for its focus on accountability through data, advancing the aim of developing tangible principles to improve student performance. Nevertheless, this strategy has also been criticised for seeking to define education and missing key social, emotional, and developmental issues, often narrowly. This narrative review attempts to put in perspective the use of the agenda in physical education and to combine evidence to assess its claims and shortcomings. The main conclusions suggest a dilemma in pedagogical practice between paying attention to a narrow definition of students’ success in terms of physical fitness and motor skills acquisition and all the other central goals, including individual improvement, societal change, and interest in engaging in physical activity throughout life. This review takes a step towards identifying solutions to various issues in physical education by addressing evidence-based approaches and the need for interdependency with educational aims, improving the effectiveness of physical education towards students’ health and well-being.
Downloads
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. Routledge.
Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x
Bailey, R. (2020). Defining physical literacy: Making sense of a promiscuous concept. Sport in Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1777104
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R., & BERA Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Special Interest Group. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
Baxter, J. & Clarke, J. (2013). Farewell to the tick box inspector? Ofsted and the changing regime of school inspection in England. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 702-718.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22.
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Blair, S. N., & Cheng, Y. (2018). Physical activity interventions in youth: Meeting the needs of the future. Kinesiology Review, 7(2), 101–106.
Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine). Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: A recommended strategy for the U.S. Department of Education. Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy.
Coe, R., & Kime, S. (2019). A (new) manifesto for evidence-based education: Twenty years on. Sunderland. Evidence Based Education.
Dalkiran, O., Eryigit, F., & Sivri, S. (2020). Comparison of the Effects of Constructivist Learning on Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Fields Applied in Physical Education Courses. African Educational Research Journal, 8, 327-334. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.8S2.20.062
Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (Eds.). (1999). What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Policy Press.
Dekker, I., & Meeter, M. (2022). Evidence-based education: Objections and future directions. Frontiers in Education, 7, 941410. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.941410
Durden-Myers, E. J., & Whitehead, M. E. (2018). From philosophy to practice: Physical literacy in the 21st Century. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0136
Gorard, S. (2020). Getting evidence into education: Evaluating the routes to policy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279088
Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Teacher Training Agency.
Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Hinduja, P. (2021). From behaviorism to constructivism in the teaching-learning process. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 9(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0922109204
HM Government. (2023). What Works Network Strategy. Evaluation Task Force. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/evaluation-task-force
Houser, N., & Kriellaars, D. (2023). “Where was this when I was in Physical Education?” Physical literacy enriched pedagogy in a quality physical education context. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1185680.
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.
Kretchmar, R. S. (2000). Joy and delight in movement. In R. L. Decker (Ed.), Philosophy and education. Stipes.
Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355-382.
Macdonald, D. (2013). The physical education profession and its professional responsibility... or... why '12 weeks paid holiday' arguments don't wash. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(5), 1-12.
Ndaruhutse, S., Jones, C., & Riggall, A. (2019). Why systems thinking is important for the education sector. Education Development Trust.
O’Connor, K. (2022). Constructivism, curriculum and the knowledge question: tensions and challenges for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585
Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. Polity Press.
Oakley, A., Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2005). The politics of evidence and methodology: lessons from the EPPI-Centre. Evidence & Policy, 1(1), 5-31.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Oliver, K. L., & Kirk, D. (2016). Girls, gender and physical education: An activist approach. Routledge.
Penney, D. (2013). Points of tension and possibility in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12465510
Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of Educational Research. Continuum.
Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of education: Aims, theory, common sense, and research. Continuum.
Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory—Albert Bandura. Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_7
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.
Thiedig, C. (2023). Evidence use in higher education decision-making and policy: A scoping review of empirical studies from 2010 to 2022. London Review of Education, 22(1), https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.36
White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247
Whitehead, M. E. (2010). Physical literacy: throughout the lifecourse. Routledge.
Williams, S. M., & Lacy, A. C. (2018). Measurement and evaluation in physical education and exercise science. Routledge.
