Gendered Physical Education Facilities in Philippine Junior High schools: Pathways Toward Gender Equity

Authors

  • David Christian Pascual De La Salle University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69665/iss.v48i1S.121

Keywords:

gender equity, physical education, inclusive facilities, junior high school, Philippines

Abstract

While gender equality is a stated goal of Philippine education policy, physical education (PE) and sports facilities in junior high schools remain structurally unequal. These spaces often reflect and reinforce gender norms that disadvantage girls and female students, limiting their participation, safety, and agency in PE contexts. This study investigates how PE and sports facilities in junior high schools promote or hinder gender equality for girls and identifies inclusive practices that can transform physical environments into equitable learning spaces. A qualitative case study approach was conducted across four junior high schools in Laguna using purposive sampling. Participants included 20 female students (ages 13–15, Grades 7–9) and 8 PE teachers. Data were collected through 28 semi-structured interviews, facility audits using a validated inclusivity assessment tool (Santos, 2023; content validity and inter-rater agreement established), and document analysis. Thematic analysis guided interpretation using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive framework. Ethical safeguards included IRB approval, student assent, parental consent, and confidentiality measures. Four major themes appeared: (1) Prioritized access for boys’ sports limited girls’ opportunities; (2) Inadequate privacy and safety infrastructure led to discomfort, with 70% of girls reporting concerns about changing spaces; (3) Facilities were perceived and used as male-dominated zones, with one student stating, “The gym feels like it belongs to the boys, not us”; and (4) Student-led initiatives demonstrated agency and demand for inclusive reform. Despite policy rhetoric on inclusion, physical spaces often reproduce exclusionary norms. However, small, student-driven innovations offer pathways to gender-responsive transformation. This study proposes a framework for transforming PE facilities based on feminist pedagogy, inclusive design, and participatory planning. It affirms the value of applying validated assessment tools to school environments and contributes to SDG 4 and SDG 5 by promoting equitable, inclusive, and empowering PE for all genders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azzarito, L. (2010). Future Girls, transcendent femininities and new pedagogies: toward girls' hybrid bodies? Sport, education and society, 15(3), 261–275.

Azzarito, L., & Hill, J. (2013). Girls looking for a ‘second home’: Bodies, difference and places of inclusion. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 18(4), 351–375.

Brussino, O., & McBrien, J. (2022). Gender stereotypes in education: Policies and practices to address gender stereotyping across OECD education systems. OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/a46ae056-en

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Commission on Higher Education. (2015). CHED memorandum order no. 01, s. 2015: Gender and development. https://csu.edu.ph/docs/GAD/CHED%20Memorandum%20No.%2001%20Series%202015.pdf

Flintoff, A. (2018). Diversity, inclusion and (anti) racism in health and physical education: what can a critical whiteness perspective offer?: Fritz Duras Lecture, Melbourne University, 22 November 2017. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 9(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2018.1488374

Flintoff, A., & Fitzgerald, H. (2012). Theorizing difference and (in) equality in physical education, youth sport and health. In Equity and difference in physical education, youth sport and health (pp. 11–36). Routledge.

Gerdin, G., & Pringle, R. (2022). Towards more equal power relations in physical education: power, resistance and social transformation. Sport in Society, 25(6), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2022.2064108

Greey, A. D. (2023). ‘It’s just safer when I don’t go there’: trans people’s locker room membership and participation in physical activity. Journal of homosexuality, 70(8), 1609–1631.

Guerrero, M. A., & Guerrero Puerta, L. (2023). Advancing gender equality in schools through inclusive physical education and teaching training: A systematic review. Societies, 13(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030064

Kelly, M., Ellaway, R., Scherpbier, A., King, N., & Dornan, T. (2019). Body pedagogics: Embodied learning for the health professions. Medical Education, 53(10), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13916

Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2022). Promoting fair and just school environments: Developing inclusive youth. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211073795

Kirk, D. (2010). The “masculinity vortex” of school physical education: Beyond the myth. In J. Evans, B. Davies, & J. Wright (Eds.), Boys’ bodies: Speaking the unspoken (pp. 46–51). Routledge.

Leahy, D., Wright, J., & Penney, D. (2017). The political is critical: explorations of the contemporary politics of knowledge in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(5), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1329141

Martin, J. T., & Santos, M. E. (2015). Perceived barriers to walking activity of college students. Asia Life Sciences, 24(1), 207–218.

Martin, J., De Jesus, J., Fernandez, M., Fuentes, M., Sicat, D. K., Cruz, N. D., Santos, M. (2023). Factors Related to the Competition Success of Student-Athletes towards a Framework for Successful Performance. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 11(5), 939–946.. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2023.110501

Martin, J., Santos, M., & Tubera, J. (2017). Students’ Motivation Profiles as Predictors of Physical Activity Participation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2017)-Volume (Vol. 1, pp. 349–353).

Martin, J. T., Tubera, J. G., Monta, V. D., Naguiat, E. S., Yambao, M. J. C., Tullao, M., & Baligad, R. (2016). Motivation and physical activity participation of Filipino college students. Asia Life Sciences, 25(1), 245–54.

Meier, S., Raab, A., Höger, B., & Diketmüller, R. (2022). ‘Same, same, but different?!’ Investigating diversity issues in the current Austrian National Curriculum for Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 28(1), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x211027072

Oliver, K. L., & Kirk, D. (2016). Towards an activist approach to research and advocacy for girls and physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2014.895803

Philpot, R., Gerdin, G., Smith, W., Linnér, S., Schenker, K., Westlie, K., Mordal Moen, K., & Larsson, L. (2021). Taking action for social justice in HPE classrooms through explicit critical pedagogies. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(6), 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1867715

Preece, S., & Bullingham, R. (2022). Gender stereotypes: the impact upon perceived roles and practice of in-service teachers in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1848813

Prevandos, F. G., & Martin, J. T. (2022). Development and Validation of Module in Physical Education 4: Team Sports. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(6), 1327–1336.

Rich, E. (2018). Gender, health and physical activity in the digital age: between post feminism and pedagogical possibilities. Sport, Education and Society, 23(8), 736–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1497593

Santillan, J. P., Martin, J. T., Santos, M. E., & Yambao, L. L. (2018). International students’ cultural adaptation in the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal, 20(12), 234–252.

Santos, M. (2024). Development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire for assessing fitness centers. Jurnal SPORTIF Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 10(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v10i1.22124

Streetman, A. E., Lister, M. M., Brown, A., Brin, H. N., & Heinrich, K. M. (2023). A mixed-methods study of women’s empowerment through physical activities: Relationships with self-efficacy and physical activity levels. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 8(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030118

Stride, A., Brazier, R., Piggott, S., Staples, M., & Flintoff, A. (2022). Gendered power alive and kicking? An analysis of four English secondary school PE departments. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1825933

Thorpe, H. (2017). Feminist views of action sports. In The Palgrave handbook of feminism and sport, leisure and physical education (pp. 699–719). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Vertinsky, P. A. (1992). Reclaiming space, revisioning the body: The quest for gender-sensitive physical education. Quest, 44(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1992.10484063

Weiler, K. (2023). Feminist analyses of gender and schooling. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 269–290). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

03/31/2026

How to Cite

Pascual, D. C. (2026). Gendered Physical Education Facilities in Philippine Junior High schools: Pathways Toward Gender Equity. International Sports Studies, 48(1S), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.69665/iss.v48i1S.121